Jul 30th
2009

Pepsi’s rebranding effort

Posted in: Branding

Pepsi has recently been having a series of backfires with its rebranding efforts. The rebranding of Tropicana’s packaging was met with huge resistance when consumers mistook it for a generic-looking carton (you can read this article from Fast Company for more information on what happened). Even Pepsi’s newly redesigned logo has been criticized by many.

Continue reading →

Jul 24th
2009

Should you still support Internet Explorer 6 (IE6)?

Posted in: Design

Internet Explorer 6 (IE6) will be 8 years old in August. That’s ANCIENT in the technology world. Yet many web designers still find themselves supporting IE6. Should you? For the UCLA Gateway (http://www.ucla.edu) in July 2009, 62% of our visitors were using IE and of that 35% were using IE6.

Continue reading →

Jul 13th
2009

960 pixels is the new 760 pixels

Posted in: Design

960 Grid Layout

I’ve been asked quite frequently what the current “standard” is in width when designing layouts for web design. While there is really no set “standard”, 960 pixels is one of the most frequently used dimensions, and it’s the one I recommend. There’s even a website dedicated to the 960 pixel grid layout called the 960 Grid System. Some may even argue that it’s now gone beyond that.

Continue reading →

Jul 12th
2009

Co-Branding

Posted in: Branding

I recently read how Saturn dealers were proudly associating themselves with the Penske Automotive Group shortly after the announcement of the planned acquisition of Saturn by Penske. One Saturn dealer was quoted as saying there was a 35% sales jump in June over the prior year after the announcement was made. The apparent reason had been due to the power of co-branding.

Co-Branding has been in existence for a long time. Have you ever noticed that most Barnes & Noble bookstores have Starbucks coffee shops in them? Or how about when you get those little ketchup packets from In-N-Out and they’re from Heinz.

If done effectively, co-branding can combine the strength of 2 brands to help bring enormous benefits in growing new market share and awareness. However, it can also have its share of weaknesses as well.

One major hurdle in co-branding can be the differences in values that each brand imposes, and trying to find the right balance to complement each other. Take for example Tim Hortons and Cold Stone.

If you’ve ever been to Canada, you’ll know that Tim Hortons is huge over there. They have a cult like following and are virtually on every street corner. They’re like the Starbucks of the United States. Cold Stone is an ice cream parlor that is now in almost every major city and town in the United States.

This article from BusinessWeek entitled “Tim Hortons and Cold Stone: Co-Branding Strategies” explains some of the challenges, issues, and criteria that the two companies faced when deciding whether to initially partner.

Of course, co-branding can come with risks as this article from BusinessWeek entitled “The Pros and Cons of Co-Branding” helps highlight.

In the end, it’s important to remember that co-branding is about picking a partner who closely matches your brands value, strategies and image.

Page 11 of 11« First...7891011